Microsoft + Yahoo vs Google ?

Filed Under (Business News) by fred on 29-07-2009

Tagged Under : , ,

microsoft and yahoo

 

CNNMoney reported that Microsoft and Yahoo have finally come to a search deal and will announce the details of the agreement in the next 24 hours, according to a report.

It is not clear whether the two companies have signed any official papers, but the negotiations of the deal, which also includes advertising, have finally come to a close, The Wall Street Journal said Tuesday.

Yahoo and Microsoft have been in talks for some time to join forces on Internet search and advertising technology. Together, the two could stand a better chance to gain market share from rival Google.

Microsoft launched its own Internet search portal, Bing, in early June. While Bing met with initial success, Microsoft has still been unable to post a profit in its online advertising business.

Microsoft and Yahoo would share revenues on the deal, and Yahoo would not get any money up front, according to the Journal.

Related Posts:

US regulators ban “naked” short-selling permanently

Filed Under (Stock Market) by fred on 28-07-2009

Tagged Under : ,

us-securities-and-exchange-commission

Federal regulators on Monday made permanent an emergency rule put in at the height of last fall’s market turmoil that aims to reduce abusive short-selling.

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it took the action on the rule targeting so-called “naked” short-selling, which was due to expire Friday.

Short-sellers bet against a stock. They generally borrow a company’s shares, sell them, and then buy them when the stock falls and return them to the lender – pocketing the difference in price.

“Naked” short-selling occurs when sellers don’t even borrow the shares before selling them, and then look to cover positions sometime after the sale.

The SEC rule includes a requirement that brokers must promptly buy or borrow securities to deliver on a short sale.

Brokers acting for short sellers must find a party believed to be able to deliver the shares within three days after the short-sale trade.

If the shares aren’t delivered within that time, there is deemed to be a “failure to deliver.”

Brokers can be subject to penalties if the failure to deliver isn’t resolved by the start of trading on the following day.

At the same time, the SEC has been considering several new approaches to reining in rushes of regular short-selling that also can cause dramatic plunges in stock prices.

Investors and lawmakers have been clamoring for the SEC to put new brakes on trading moves they say worsened the market’s downturn starting last fall.

SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro has said she is making the issue a priority.

Some securities industry officials, however, have maintained that the SEC’s emergency order on “naked” short-selling brought unintended negative consequences, such as wilder price swings and turbulence in the market.

The five SEC commissioners voted in April to put forward for public comment five alternative short-selling plans.

One option is restoring a Depression-era rule that prohibits short sellers from making their trades until a stock ticks at least one penny above its previous trading price.

The goal of the so-called uptick rule is to prevent selling sprees that feed upon themselves – actions that battered the stocks of banks and other companies over the last year.

Another approach would ban short-selling for the rest of the trading session in a stock that declines by 10 percent or more.

Schapiro said last week the SEC could decide on a final course of action in “the next several weeks or several months.”

Sen. Ted Kaufman, a Democrat from Delaware and one of a bipartisan group of seven senators who have been pushing the SEC to rein in short-selling overall or face legislative action, said Monday that “investors need to see concrete steps.”

“Instead of proposing action today to deal with the problem, the SEC apparently is content to let potential solutions sit on the shelf for another two months,” Kaufman said in a statement.

“… If the market were to decline precipitously again and the banks propped up by taxpayer funds were to become vulnerable again, that is not an insignificant risk.”

In addition to making the “naked” short-selling rule permanent, the SEC and its staff are working with major stock exchanges to make data on short-sale transactions and volumes publicly available through the exchanges’ Web sites, the SEC announcement said.

It will result in “a substantial increase” over the amount of information currently required, the agency said.

“Today’s actions demonstrate the (SEC’s) determination to address short-selling abuses while at the same time increasing public disclosure of short-selling activities that affect our markets,” Schapiro said in a statement.

The SEC also said it will hold a public hearing on Sept. 30 to address stock lending for short-selling and possible new disclosures related to short-selling that could be required.

Separately Monday, Sen. Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat and a member of the Senate Banking Committee, said he has asked Schapiro to ban the practice of so-called “flash trading,” which enables some big Wall Street banks and hedge funds to get an advance look at investors’ stock orders before they hit the market.

The use of super-fast computers by those participants to spy on orders gives them an unfair advantage, Schumer wrote in a letter Schapiro.

If the SEC fails to act, Schumer said he would consider proposing legislation to ban flash trading.

“This kind of unfair access seriously compromises the integrity of our markets and creates a two-tiered system where a privileged group of insiders receive preferential treatment, depriving others of a fair price for their transactions,” Schumer told Schapiro.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

AIG spinning off troubled subsidiary AIU Holdings

Filed Under (Business News) by fred on 28-07-2009

Tagged Under : , ,

aig

Insurer American International Group Inc. took another step Monday toward spinning off its property casualty and general insurance business and renamed the operation Chartis.

AIG placed Chartis, formerly known as AIU Holdings, into a separate unit known as a special-purpose vehicle, or SPV.

SPVs are entities sometimes set up ahead of the split or sale of a unit to separate its operations from the parent company.

In April, New York-based AIG said it would spin off AIU Holdings, which includes commercial insurance, foreign general insurance and private client group businesses, into a separate firm as part of its restructuring plan to help repay a $182.5 billion government bailout.

The business serves more than 40 million clients in 160 locations.

Kristian Moor was named president and CEO of Chartis on Monday.

The government provided AIG with an $85 billion rescue package amid the growing credit crisis in September.

In return, the government took about an 80 percent stake in AIG.

Since then, the government has provided additional rounds of support that now total $182.5 billion.

AIG has been selling assets, cutting costs and planning to spin off multiple operations to repay the government.

Aside from AIU Holdings, AIG has also said it would place two life-insurance subsidiaries – American International Assurance Co. and American Life Insurance Co. – into special-purpose vehicles ahead of planned spinoffs.

After setting up a special-purpose vehicle, AIG could still have the option of selling the operations to another investor or launching initial public offerings for shares in the businesses.

Although AIG could retain majority stakes in each of the spinoffs, separating the units allows them to create different management teams to operate the firms.

The spinoffs also allow AIG to separate the still-performing businesses from a parent company whose brand is likely hindering business.

Being able to rename some of the operations while cashing in a portion of their market value could help further stabilize business while paying off the government loan.

Related Posts: