Citigroup back in black

Filed Under (Business News) by fred on 20-04-2010

Tagged Under :

Citigroup delivered its strongest results since the start of the financial crisis, as the banking giant reported a first-quarter profit of $4.4 billion Monday.

Earnings for the bank, one of the hardest hit institutions in the financial crisis, easily shattered Wall Street estimates. On a per share basis the company said it earned 15 cents. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected the company to break even for the quarter.

The rebound in Citigroup shares appears as if it will continue following Monday’s impressive results.

Citigroup shares, which are up 55% from a year ago, gained over 3% in afternoon trading on the news.

Investors have been anxious for Citigroup to return to a sustained level of profitability after the bank endured billions of dollars in losses over the past two years. The latest results, Citi’s biggest profit since the second quarter of 2007, suggest that it may have finally found its footing.

“Citi today is fundamentally a very different company from what it was only two years ago,” Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit said in a statement.

The company also made a point of disclosing it was not involved with last Friday’s announcement by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which alleged that competitor Goldman Sachs defrauded investors in a sale of securities tied to subprime mortgages.

John Gerspach, Citigroup’s chief financial officer, added that the company was cooperating with ongoing investigations being conducted by the SEC, but declined to comment further.

Citigroup’s latest results were defined by two key trends: improving credit quality and a surge in trading activity.

The New York City-based bank said it experienced marked improvement in both its consumer and corporate loan portfolios provided a lift during the quarter. Moderating loan troubles across its U.S. residential mortgage business, for example, prompted the company to set aside less money for future loan losses.

“Things are getting better in terms of credit, not worse,” said William Smith, president and senior portfolio manager at Smith Asset Management, whose firm owns shares of Citi. “Once things stabilize, hopefully [Citi] can reverse some of those loan-loss provisions.”

Conditions also appeared to improve within the company’s Citi Holdings division, which was created to house the firm’s so-called “troubled assets” and businesses it has been looking to sell. Losses within the unit narrowed to $876 million from $2.5 billion in the fourth quarter of 2009.

But the biggest driver of Citi’s results was its securities and banking division, particularly its bond trading business. Revenue from that unit more than doubled from the previous quarter to $5.4 billion.

Strong trading profits also helped Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase in the first quarter. Each enjoyed a bump in trading revenue that helped them deliver better-than-expected profits last week.

Executives at Citi cautioned though that those numbers were driven by a seasonal spike in activity and were unlikely to be repeated in the following quarters.

Pandit, who has been under scrutiny for his ability to lead the company, also warned that profits within the firm’s other divisions were also susceptible.

The bank’s consumer lending business, he noted, could suffer if Washington attempts to enact a severe new set of rules for Wall Street or if the recovery in the U.S. economy gets derailed.

“We are proud of our first quarter results but remain cautious about the environment, given the uncertain economic recovery and high unemployment in the U.S.,” he said.

Citigroup must also contend with having the U.S. government as its largest shareholder. Taxpayers still own a 27% stake in the company, although the Treasury Department has said it planned to dispose of its remaining stake in the firm “as soon as possible.”

Still, Citi’s strong first quarter puts the company well on the way to reaching earnings projections offered last month by Pandit. During a company-sponsored conference in March, he told investors that he expected the company to soon be able to deliver profits of approximately $20 billion.

The numbers should also provide additional encouragement about the health of the nation’s top banks. Of the big banks that have reported so far, all have delivered results that were far better than most industry analysts were anticipating.

Several other key banks are due to report this week, including Goldman Sachs on Tuesday. Goldman is expected to report strong profits but that news is likely to be overshadowed by Friday’s announcement from the SEC.

Related Posts:

Citigroup fourth quarter lost US$7.6 billion

Filed Under (Business News) by fred on 20-01-2010

Tagged Under :

citigroup

Citigroup reported a painful fourth-quarter loss of $7.6 billion Tuesday, even amid signs that the worst may be behind the troubled financial giant.

Last month’s decision to refund $20 billion in outstanding bailout funds to American taxpayers was the primary reason behind the bank’s loss.

The move, which helped alleviate some of the government scrutiny the bank has had to endure over the past year, including questions on how it compensates its top executives, resulted in Citigroup reporting a loss of 33 cents on per share basis.

That was in line with what Wall Street was expecting from Citigroup, although the company said it still would have reported a loss of $1.4 billion if it did not take a big charge to pay back the government.

Citigroup also said it spent $25 billion to compensate its employees in 2009, which broke down to roughly $90,000 per employee. A year ago, the bank paid $31.1 billion to its employees, but Citigroup had far more many workers in 2008. The bank sold several divisions in 2009.

Tuesday’s results bring to a close a rather difficult year for the New York City-based bank that included talk of possible government nationalization and its stock price tumbling below $1 a share.

Even though many of Citigroup’s peers returned to profitability last year, the bank lost $1.6 billion. Still, that was far less than the $27.7 billion it lost just a year earlier, one of the toughest period’s in the company’s nearly 200-year history.

Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit, who has tried to lead the company back to profitability over the past two years, called 2009 a period of “enormous progress.”

“As we enter 2010, we are strongly capitalized, significantly more efficient, and are executing on a clear strategy that is focused on clients,” he said in a statement.

The bank also highlighted some encouraging signs within its massive loan portfolio. Credit losses fell to $7.1 billion during the quarter, down $800 million from the previous three-month period.

Citigroup also set aside less money for bad loans during the quarter, suggesting that related losses may soon start to moderate.

“Provisions and charge-offs were lower than we expected, suggesting that [Citigroup's] outlook for its loan book has improved,” wrote Stuart Plesser, senior bank equity analyst with Standard & Poor’s, in a note to clients after Citigroup’s results were released.

But much of that improvement was outside the United States, particularly in countries like Korea and Mexico, just two of the countries where Citigroup operates worldwide.

Pandit noted however that the bank remains particularly concerned about loans tied to the American consumer, particularly with so many individuals out of work and the recovery in the housing market still tentative.

“U.S. credit in my view comes down mostly to the mortgage portfolio,” said Pandit during a conference call. “That is what we are watching most carefully.”

Much of those so-called troubled assets however remain within the company’s Citi Holdings division, which was created a little more than a year ago as a dumping ground for assets it has been looking to get rid off. Losses within that division widened to $2.4 billion during the quarter.

But things were hardly rosy either within the company’s Citicorp unit, which include the businesses the company has staked its future on. Sales at its consumer, investment banking and transaction services businesses declined from the third quarter.

Revenues at Citi’s massive North American credit card business, for example, fell largely due to a new series of federal rules aimed at making banks’ credit card practices more consumer friendly.

Despite the less-than-stellar results, Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) shares gained more than 3% in afternoon trading Tuesday, rebounding from losses earlier in the day after the results were first announced.

The company is the second major financial firm to report its fourth quarter results. So far, investors have been largely disappointed.

Although JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) posted a better-than-expected profit on Friday, the stock fell due to cautious comments about the economy from CEO Jamie Dimon. The stock was down again on Tuesday.

Related Posts:

Citigroup raised fresh $2billion from bond market

Filed Under (Business News) by Fred Chan on 16-05-2009

Tagged Under : , ,

citigroup

Citigroup Friday sold $2 billion in debt, its first U.S. corporate bond sale without a government guarantee in nine months in a sign of improved confidence in the bank as it recovers from a credit crisis.

Long viewed as one of the most troubled U.S. banks, Citigroup’s return to the corporate bond market came after government stress tests last week showed its capital position was better than many feared.

The stress tests, announced by U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner in February, were meant to restore investor trust in major banks after massive losses raised fears about financial failures.

Citigroup’s self-led note sale attracted more than $5 billion in interest, according to a buyside trader looking at the deal. Citigroup was the latest of a number of large banks to sell debt without government backing since the stress test results were released a week ago.

“If I were Mr. Geithner, I would be pleased to see this news, because it is a vote of confidence in the results of the stress tests and the rest of the actions the government has been taking to restore market confidence,” said Kathleen Shanley, analyst at independent research service Gimme Credit.

Citigroup sold its 10-year notes with a yield of 8.765 percent, or 562.5 basis points more than U.S. Treasuries, according to IFR, a Thomson Reuters service.

Proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes, which may include funding operations, acquisitions, business expansion or debt refinancing, according to IFR.
“Just a few weeks ago, I don’t think anyone would have predicted Citigroup would be tapping the market so soon,” Shanley said. “For Citigroup, it is very important for them to show that they are not the only bank of the 19 in the stress test group that is unable to issue non-guaranteed debt.”

Stress tests showed that 10 of the 19 largest banks need to build capital by about $75 billion to be able to withstand a worst-case scenario set by the government.

Citigroup, which was told it needed to raise $5.5 billion, has said it would exchange that amount of preferred securities for common stock. Citigroup has suffered more than $90 billion of writedowns and credit losses since mid-2007.

Citigroup’s bonds and shares have rallied since March 10, when Chief Executive Vikram Pandit said the bank was profitable in the first two months of the year.

Yield spreads on Citigroup’s 6.125 percent notes due in 2018 have declined to 521 basis points over Treasuries from 646 basis points the day before Pandit’s remarks. Falling yield spreads over Treasuries indicate investors see less risk.

 

Other banks that have issued non-guaranteed debt in recent weeks include JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, US Bancorp, Morgan Stanley, Bank of New York Mellon, Goldman Sachs, BB&T Corp and Northern Trust Corp.

Citigroup and other banks had been issuing debt with the backing of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp since the credit crisis eroded investor confidence last year, sending banks’ borrowing costs soaring.

Banks have been attempting to wean themselves off government support to shake off tight restrictions, including caps on compensation. Regulators have said selling non-guaranteed debt was a key condition for being permitted to repay funds from the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program.

Still, selling non-guaranteed debt remains costly, with banks’ yield spreads much higher than before the credit crisis, an indicator of investor caution. – Reuters

Related Posts:

Page 1 of 212